Author, year of publication | Educational theory (if any) | Validated assessment tool | Unvalidated assessment tool | Method of assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adhikari et al., 2021 [57] | Gamification | X |  | • NASC-CDM scale • Qualitative data collection: Informal debrief and semi-structured interviews (focus group or one to one) |
Anbro et al., 2020 [24] | NA |  | X | • Predetermined verbal checkback opportunities • Eye gaze metrics for predetermined areas of interest |
Atthill et al., 2021 [25] | Experiential learning theory | X |  | • NASC-CDM |
Blanie et al., 2020 [26] | Experiential learning theory |  | X | • Script concordance tests (SCT) — case-based tests consisting of short scenarios for which each trainee must interpret newly formulated information against a baseline to modulate the final decision along a 5-point Likert scale • Self-assessment of perceived change in clinical reasoning process • Questionnaire to assess students’ perceived satisfaction, motivation towards learning, and effectiveness of the instructional design |
Bracq et al., 2021 [27] | 3D model of debriefing | X | X | • Data regarding detected errors, time for detection, and trajectory patterns in the virtual OR for each participant • Situational Awareness Rating System (SART; Taylor, 1990) • The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX; Hart and Staveland, 1998) • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y; Marteau and Becker, 1992) • Collective debriefing • Questionnaire for attitudes and satisfaction post-simulation |
Carrard et al., 2020 [28] | N/A |  | X | • Focus groups |
Casler et al., 2022 [29] | Experiential learning theory, 3D model of debriefing | X |  | • Debriefing Experience Scale (DES) • Post-test survey — open-ended questions |
Chen and Liou, 2022 [30] | N/A |  | X | • Focus-group interviews (consisting of six 50-min sessions with 13–14 participants each) |
Cieslowski and Haas, 2023 [31] | Jefferies Simulation Theory | X | X | • Debriefing after each VR simulation session • Weekly student reflections • Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified (Leighton et al., 2018) online survey |
Colonna et al., 2022 [32] | NA | X |  | • Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES) • Fast Form of Technology Acceptance Model (FF-TAM) |
Du et al., 2022 [33] | NA |  | X | • Knowledge acquisition regarding non-technical skills (NTS) form • Real-world scenario-based tests • Knowledge acquisition test |
Fogg et al., 2020 [34] | NA | X | X | • Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric (LCJR) • Individual case scores and number of attempts |
Hu et al., 2022 [35] | NA |  | X | • Twenty multiple-choice questions to test mastery of essential disaster evacuation management educational knowledge and decision-making abilities — administered as a pre-test, posttest, and final test • Instructional mode opinion survey |
Jayasundera et al., 2022 [36] | NA |  | X | • Pre-post-virtual reality simulation confidence ratings (17-item questionnaire) |
Sahin Karaduman and Basak, 2023 [37] | Experiential learning cycle | X | X | • NASC-CDM • Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale • Performance assessment forms • Student feedback forms |
Pardue et al., 2022 [38] | NA | X | X | • Clinical judgement rubrics by Tanner and Lasater • Focus groups |
Kim et al., 2023 [39] | NA | X | X | • 12-item multiple-choice written examination • NASC-CDM • Learning immersion in simulation instrument by Ko • The State Empathy Questionnaire by Shen • Usability instrument by Ingrassia et al |
Kiyozumi et al., 2022 [40] | Experiential learning cycle |  | X | • Number of clears within the VR simulation program at 5-min intervals |
Kleinheksel, 2014 [41] | Constructivist theory (situated cognition and transformative learning theory) | X |  | • Reflection rating rubric (Cook (2010)) —clinical reasoning and implications for practice reflection |
Lee et al., 2022 [42] | Experiential learning theory |  | X | • Multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) for knowledge acquisition (18 item), problem—solving (30 items) • Likert scale questionnaire for learning satisfaction (nine items) |
Lee et al., 2023 [43] | 5E circular learning model | X |  | • Severity classification competency measurement tool (Moon) • Confidence in Performance in Clinical Nursing Scale (Kim) • Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (Jenkins) • Simulation Design Scale (National League for Nursing revised by Yoo) |
Mahling et al., 2023 [44] | Experiential learning |  | X | • Questionnaire to assess learner perspectives on the curricular implementation of VR in emergency medicine (13 items, 5-point Likert scale) |
Mascarenhas et al., 2023 [45] | NA |  | X | • Virtual room of errors entry form • Evaluation of the simulation experience (via Jotform) |
McCallum et al., 2011 [58] | NA |  | X | • Semi-structured, tape-recorded, one-to-one interview |
Michelet et al., 2020 [46] | NA | X |  | • Questionnaire based on International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommendations • Neonatal resuscitation performance evaluation (NRPE) system • Anaesthetists’ non-technical skills (ANTS) observation system |
Middeke et al., 2018 [47] | NA |  | X | • Formative key feature examination |
Mills et al., 2020 [48] | NA | X | X | • Heart rate via Polar S610i watches and chest straps • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) • Simulation Design Scale • Triage card placement • Focus groups |
Park et al., 2022 [49] | NA | X |  | • Problem-Solving Process Behavior Survey (Park and Woo) • Nurses’ Clinical Reasoning Scale (NCRS) Korean Version • Reflective Learning Continuum (Peltier et al.) • National League for Nursing self-confidence and satisfaction with practicum scales |
Rim and Shin, 2022 [50] | Experiential learning theory | X |  | • Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric • Korean Nurses’ Core Competency Scale |
Rogers, 2011 [51] | Constructivist learning theory |  | X | • Individual interviews |
Saab et al., 2021 [52] | N/A |  | X | • Sociodemographic questionnaire • Face-to-face individual/focus-group interviews |
Sara et al., 2021 [53] | Gamification | X |  | • Clinical Reasoning Skills scale (CRS) (Levett-Jones et al.) • Simulation metrics |
Watari et al., 2020 [54] | N/A |  | X | • 20 multiple-choice questions — 10 knowledge and 10 clinical reasoning based. Administered before and after the intervention |
Williams et al., 2020 [55] | NLN/Jefferies Simulation Framework |  | X | • Semi-structured questionnaire |
Yang and Oh, 2022 [56] | Keller’s ARCS model | X |  | • Neonatal resuscitation nursing knowledge measurement tool standardized • Problem-solving ability by adult’s tool • Korean version of Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale • Self confidence in performing neonatal resuscitation tool standardized • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) translated in Korean • Learning Motivation Test Paper (Son and Keller (2001)) |