Table 5 Satisfaction with simulation experience scale–post-workshop
Statement number | Domain | Statement | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
13 | DR | The debriefing provided an opportunity to ask questions | 4.48 (0.54) |
18 | DR | The facilitator made me feel comfortable and at ease during the debriefing | 4.45 (0.72) |
11 | DR | The facilitator summarised important issues during the debriefing | 4.42 (0.62) |
9 | CR | This was a valuable learning experience | 4.33 (0.60) |
15 | DR | Reflecting on and discussing the simulation enhanced my learning | 4.32 (0.71) |
16 | DR | The facilitator’s questions helped me to learn | 4.27 (0.69) |
1 | CL | The simulation caused me to reflect on my clinical ability | 4.22 (0.52) |
12 | DR | I had the opportunity to reflect on and discuss my performance during the debriefing | 4.15 (0.76) |
10 | DR | The facilitator provided constructive criticism during the debriefing | 4.15 (0.76) |
14 | DR | The facilitator provided feedback that helped me to develop my clinical reasoning skills | 4.10 (0.71) |
4 | CL | The simulation helped me to recognize my clinical strengths and weaknesses | 4.00 (0.78) |
17 | DR | I received feedback during the debriefing that helped me to learn | 3.98 (0.89) |
3 | CL | The simulation helped me to apply what I have learned | 3.97 (0.76) |
5 | CR | The simulation developed my clinical reasoning skills | 3.95 (0.70) |
6 | CR | The simulation developed my clinical decision-making ability | 3.87 (0.79) |
2 | CL | The simulation tested my clinical ability | 3.78 (0.91) |
8 | CR | The simulation helped me to recognize patient deterioration early | 3.62 (0.96) |
7 | CR | The simulation enabled me to demonstrate my clinical reasoning skills | 3.55 (1.05) |