Skip to main content

Table 3 Explanation of the types of ICC (adapted from Landers, 2015 [28]), with justification of the type of ICC used in this study

From: Beyond reliability: assessing rater competence when using a behavioural marker system

Type of ICC

Explanation of the difference

Type used in this study

Justification

One-way random (ICC 1), two-way random (ICC 2) or two-way mixed (ICC 3)

One-way random assumes that there are no consistent raters for all ratees

Two-way random assumes consistent raters for all ratees, and the raters are a sample from a larger population. Two-way mixed assumes consistent raters for all ratees, and the raters are a population, not a sample

Two-way random

All raters rated the same ratees. Our raters were a sample from a larger population

Correlation or absolute agreement

Absolute agreement is used when it is important for scores to be the same (such as in academic exams). Correlation is used if, for example, a mean of ratings will be used, and the absolute value is less important

Absolute agreement

Desire to know how well each rater would assess the ratee

Single measures or average measures

The single-measures ICC determines the accuracy of a single rater when used alone. The average-measures ICC determines the accuracy if multiple raters are used

Single measures

Desire to understand the accuracy of a single rater when used alone