Table 2 Intraclass correlation (ICC) values of each of the 12 items and each of the three TEAM domains rated by two raters. CI confidence interval
From: TEAMs go VR—validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training
Items in TEAM | ICC (CI 95%) | ICC (CI 95%) |
|---|---|---|
Consistency | Agreement | |
Leadership | 0.75 (0.48–0.89) | 0.76 (0.49–0.90) |
1. The team leader let the team know what was expected of them through direction and command. | 0.70 (0.16–0.91) | 0.70 (0.19–0.91) |
2. The team leader maintained a global perspective. | 0.82 (0.43–0.95) | 0.84 (0.46–0.96) |
Teamwork | 0.90 (0.84–0.94) | 0.90 (0.84–0.93) |
3. The team communicated effectively. | 0.84 (0.47–0.96) | 0.85 (0.50–0.96) |
4. The team worked together to complete the tasks in a timely manner. | 0.96 (0.83–0.99) | 0.96 (0.84–0.99) |
5. The team acted with composure and control. | 0.80 (0.38–0.95) | 0.80 (0.41–0.95) |
6. The team morale was positive. | 0.72 (0.21–0.92) | 0.74 (0.22–0.93) |
7. The team adapted to changing situations. | 0.86 (0.55–0.97) | 0.85 (0.52–0.96) |
8. The team monitored and reassessed the situation. | 0.93 (0.74–0.98) | 0.93 (0.75–0.98) |
9. The team anticipated potential actions. | 0.94 (0.77–0.98) | 0.94 (0.78–0.98) |
Task management | 0.77 (0.50–0.90) | 0.77 (0.51–0.94) |
10. The team prioritised tasks. | 0.75 (0.27–0.93) | 0.77 (0.30–0.94) |
11. The team followed approved standards / guidelines. | 0.82 (0.42–0.95) | 0.82 (0.45–0.95) |
Overall | ||
12. On a scale of 1–10, give your global rating of the team’s performance. | 0.91 (0.70–0.98) | 0.91 (0.71–0.98) |