Table 1 An extract of the analysis
Meaning units | Subcategory | Main category |
|---|---|---|
The facilitators showed understanding for the lack of experience. They asked questions but did not push, rather explained. The facilitator asked good questions for reflection, which challenged us to think for ourselves | Balancing safety and challenges | Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection |
The facilitator emphasized the positive and had a constructive way of giving feedback. We needed feedback on whether we understood and acted correctly. Gave useful feedback also on mistakes and potential for improvement | Providing constructive feedback | |
The facilitator described variations using theory and by sharing own experiences, which was very useful. It was instructive when the things that happened were linked to knowledge and when our actions were put into context with possible outcomes. Gave examples that showed us options for action. There is not only one solution, but there are many ways to act | Facilitating the discovery of coherence and alternative options | |
The facilitator had a guiding role. The facilitator took control and ensured we got through everything we had to, and everyone got to talk. The facilitator gave just the right amount of time for reflection | Providing structure as a prerequisite for dialogue |