Skip to main content

Table 1 (abstract O6). Comparisons of study outcomes according to advanced airway tools

From: Meeting Abstracts for the Society for Simulation in Europe 2024

Parameters

Endotracheal Entubation

Laryngeal Mask Airway

p

First effective ventilation begining time with advanced airway tool, mean SD, s

73.88 ± 51.68

38.29 ± 35.21

0.001

Time to connect to defibrillator, mean SD, s

11.41± 3.02

12.64 ± 4.06

0.56

Time to antiarrhythmic drug request, mean SD, s

8.82 ± 36.38

16 ± 54.41

0.46

Time to rhythm identification, mean SD, s

27.05 ± 46.28

15.52 ± 8.49

0.56

Time to identification unstable patient, mean SD, s

14.52 ± 9.32

11.82 ± 5.06

0.48

Time to start CPR, mean SD, s

26.11 ± 16.12

20.29 ± 9.35

0.16

Time until defibrillation begins, mean SD, s

81.47 ± 43.28

48.70 ± 35.88

0.04

First adrenaline administration time, mean SD, s

73.41 ± 51.21

57.70 ± 35.76

0.27

Number of multiple advanced airway attempts, n (%)

2 (11.7)

-

-

Antiarrhythmic drug request, n (%)

1 (5.9)

3 (17.6)

-

Electrical intervention, n (%)

Synchronized

1 (5.9)

1 (5.9)

-

Unsynchronized

16 (94.1)

16 (94.1)

-

Is the defibrillation dose adequate?

Yes

14 (%82.4)

12 (%70.6)

-

No

3 (%17.6)

5 (%29.4)

 

Was appropriate defibrillation performed?

(safety precaution-warnings)

Yes

17 (%100)

17 (%100)

-

No

-

-

 

Anxiety level before scenarios, median (IQR)

7 (3-8)

6 (3-8)

0.85

Anxiety level after scenarios, median (IQR)

7 (3-9)

6 (3-8)

0.40

  1. SD Standart deviation, CPR Cardiopulmonary resusitation, IQR Interquartile range
  2. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05